RESEARCH
Decades of research and the results from the places where patient safety standards have been implemented—in California, Massachusetts, and internationally—have shown that they work—that, in fact, they are the only approach that works.
That's why 90% of the public support mandatory staffing standards, and why momentum is growing to enact them in other states. A safe staffing bill much like ours in Pennsylvania just recently passed in Oregon. In addition to PA, the following states have pending safe staffing legislation: Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, and New Jersey.
Safe Staffing Standards in PA Hospitals Will Save Lives…and Money
The Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research at UPenn estimates that HB106, if implemented in PA, would have the following positive impacts on patient care. Just looking at med surg units alone (impacts across all units would be much greater):
- 1,155 hospital deaths would be prevented annually.
- 771 hospital readmissions would be avoided annually.
- Length of stay would be reduced by 34,919 days annually.
These patient care impacts would lead to substantial cost savings for hospitals (again, these estimates consider med surg units only and would be much greater across all hospital units):
- Reducing length of stay by 39K days annually—would save $93 million
- Hospitals would see additional savings from higher satisfaction, avoiding readmission penalties, reducing turnover, and reducing burnout
Further cost reductions would come from reducing nurse turnover. The estimated cost of replacing a nurse is $88K. If the current turnover rate of 30% were cut in half to 15%, it would save hospitals $650 million per year.